ANALISIS PENYELESAIAN KONFLIK ILEGAL LOGGING DI DESA KELUNGKUNG PADA TAHUN 2023-2024

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the conflict resolution mechanisms implemented by the Kelungkung Village Government and to examine their effectiveness through the perspective of New Institutional Theory. A qualitative descriptive approach was employed, with data collected through nterviews, observation, and documentation. Data were analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña, consisting of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings of this study showed that conflict resolution primarily relies on non-litigation mechanisms, including negotiation, facilitated dialogue, and mediation, while formal legal settlement remains under the authority of law enforcement agencies. From the perspective of New Institutional Theory, the normative and cultural-cognitive pillars play a more significant role than the regulatory pillar in reducing social tensions through the reinforcement of social norms, community participation, and environmental awareness. However, the effectiveness of conflict resolution is constrained by the limited legal authority of the village government, weak regulatory support, and persistent economic pressures that encourage illegal logging activities. The study concludes that conflict resolution in Kelungkung Village is oriented more toward conflict management than conflict resolution. Therefore, stronger institutional collaboration, consistent law enforcement, community economic empowerment, and the integration of regulatory, normative, and cultural-cognitive approaches are essential to achieving sustainable forest governance and preventing future conflicts. These findings support the view that effective forest conflict management requires the interaction of formal institutions, informal norms, and shared social understanding in addressing complex natural resource disputes.